Sculpted's SaaS Metrics Reference
SaaS operating metrics have no GAAP. There is no FASB, no SEC mandate, and no body with the power to enforce a single definition of net revenue retention, CAC payback, or ARR. So the same underlying numbers get reported under different conventions across the market. The divergence is not an edge case. It runs metric by metric, and a number is only defensible once you name the convention behind it.
This reference does not invent definitions. It anchors each metric to the most authoritative source that defines it. For metrics with a codified consensus formula, that source is the SaaS Metrics Standards Board. For coined metrics like the magic number, the burn multiple, or LTV:CAC, it is the origin author who first defined the term.
From there, the reference maps how definitions diverge. Every metric splits along three axes: composition (what goes into the number), basis (what it is measured against), and timing (the period and the moment of measurement). Two teams can both compute net revenue retention correctly and still report different figures, because they made different choices on these axes. The table below names those choices, metric by metric.
One exclusion is deliberate. VC blog posts and benchmark decks (a16z, Bessemer, and the like) are prominent, but they are not codified consensus, so this reference does not treat them as authorities.